Cases 1 - 10 of 37
Bane et al v. 3M Company
as 2:2023cv04821
Defendant:
3M Company, Du Pont De Nemours Inc, UTC Fire & Security Americas Corporation Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Bryan Bane, Francisco Acovera, Investigator Clay Adams and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal-Personal Injury
Burnette v. Miller et al
as 7:2022cv00417
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Lee Burnette
Defendant:
Lt. Miller, Lt. Hall, Major O'Dell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bane v. Virginia Department of Corrections et al
as 7:2022cv00053
Plaintiff:
Robert Allen Bane
Defendant:
Virginia Department of Corrections, Mr. Barry Marano and JPay, LLC.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rhonda Kirschmann v. State of Virginia
as 19-2335
Defendant / Appellee:
CHESAPEAKE CIRCUIT COURT, NANCY PARR, Commonwealth's Attorney for the City of Chesapeake, SUPREME COURT OF VIRGINIA and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RHONDA KIRSCHMANN, and those similarly situated
Bane v. United States of America, The
as 2:2017cv03371
Plaintiff:
Ben W Bane
Defendant:
United States of America, The, Mr Pacheco, Adam Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 17-1429
Debtor - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 17-1069
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Bane v. C. R. Bard, Inc.
as 2:2016cv07065
Plaintiff:
Beverly K. Bane
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bane et al v. Coloplast Corp.
as 2:2015cv05523
Plaintiff:
Connie Bane and Michael Bane
Defendant:
Coloplast Corp.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv01206
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
