Land Condemnation Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 48
UNITED STATES v. 0.1785 acres of land, more or less, situate in Chesapeake, Virginia et al
as 2:2024cv00023
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES
Defendant: MSF Investors II, LLC, Arcadia Equity Associates, City Of Chesapeake and others
National Railroad Passenger Corporation (AMTRAK) v. .025 Acres More or Less of Land located at 1006 North Payson Street in Baltimore City, Maryland et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2023cv02158
Defendant: Yvette Wormley, The Estate of Lula Thrower, Testate and Intestate Successors of Lula Thrower and others
Plaintiff: National Railroad Passenger Corporation (AMTRAK)
Cause Of Action: 43 U.S.C. § 421 Complaint in Condemnation - Eminent Domain
United States of America v. 8.76 Acres, more or less situated in Silver Bow County, State of Montana et al
as 2:2022cv00011
Defendant: Opportunity Bank of America, New Direction Trust Company, 8.76 Acres, more or less situated in Silver Bow County, State of Montana and others
Plaintiff: United States of America
Cause Of Action: 49 U.S.C. § 1471 Federal Aviation Act
United States of America v. 8.76 Acres, more or less situated in Silver Bow County, State of Montana et al
as 2:2022cv00011
Defendant: Curt Pohl, Opportunity Bank of America, New Direction Trust Company and others
Plaintiff: United States of America,
Florida Gas Transmission Company, LLC v. 0.334 Acres of Land in Columbia County, Florida et al
as 3:2021cv00278
Defendant: 0.334 Acres of Land in Columbia County, Florida, Bank Of America NA, P.S. Cummins and others
Plaintiff: Florida Gas Transmission Company, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0717
United States of America et al v. Additional Rights With Respect to a Preexisting Easement and Right of Way Over Land in Montgomery County, Tennessee et al
as 3:2018cv01236
Defendant: Additional Rights With Respect to a Preexisting Easement and Right of Way Over Land in Montgomery County, Tennessee, Mortgage Electronic Recording Systems, Inc., Luke Baine and others
Plaintiff: United States of America and Tennessee Valley Authority
Cause Of Action: 16 U.S.C. § 0831
United States of America v. Additional Rights with Respect to a Preexisting Easement and Right-Of-Way Over Land in Montgomery County, Tennessee et al
as 3:2018cv01143
Defendant: Bank of America, N.A., PRLAP, INC., Additional Rights with Respect to a Preexisting Easement and Right-Of-Way Over Land in Montgomery County, Tennessee and others
Plaintiff: United States of America
Cause Of Action: 16 U.S.C. § 0831
Spire STL Pipeline LLC v. 0.34 acres of land, more or less, situated in St. Louis County, State of Missouri et al
as 4:2018cv01520
Defendant: Eugene Weidner and Joyce Weidner Revocable Trust, dated October 26, 1999, 0.34 acres of land, more or less, situated in St. Louis County, State of Missouri, Eugene Weidner, as Trustee of Eugene Weidner and Joyce Weidner Revocable Trust, dated October 26, 1999 and others
Plaintiff: Spire STL Pipeline LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717
Spire STL Pipeline LLC v. 0.34 acres of land, more or less, situated in St. Louis County, State of Missouri et al
as 4:2018cv01521
Defendant: Eugene Weidner and Joyce Weidner Revocable Trust, dated October 26, 1999, 0.34 acres of land, more or less, situated in St. Louis County, State of Missouri, Eugene Weidner, as Trustee of Eugene Weidner and Joyce Weidner Revocable Trust, dated October 26, 1999 and others
Plaintiff: Spire STL Pipeline LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717
PENNEAST PIPELINE COMPANY, LLC v. PERMANENT EASEMENT FOR 0.08 ACRES IN ALEXANDRIA TOWNSHIP, HUNTERDON COUNTY, NEW JERSEY, TAX PARCEL NO. 1001-18-18.01 et al
as 3:2018cv02027
Plaintiff: PENNEAST PIPELINE COMPANY, LLC
Defendant: PERMANENT EASEMENT FOR 0.08 ACRES IN ALEXANDRIA TOWNSHIP, HUNTERDON COUNTY, NEW JERSEY, TAX PARCEL NO. 1001-18-18.01, PERMANENT EASEMENT FOR 1.36 ACRES IN ALEXANDRIA TOWNSHIP, HUNTERDON COUNTY, NEW JERSEY, TAX PARCEL NO. 1001-18-65, CHRISTOPHER VANBURK and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?