Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Alcaraz v. Elmore et al
as 4:2023cv00984
Plaintiff:
Luis Martin Alcaraz
Defendant:
Barbara Elmore and Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Swafford v. Lonoke County Jail
as 4:2023cv00900
Plaintiff:
Kaitlynn Swafford
Defendant:
Lonoke County Jail, Faythe LaBlanc, Barbara Elmore and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Davis et al v. Handie et al
as 4:2021cv00616
Plaintiff:
Demond Davis and Ashley Munnerlyn Davis
Defendant:
Sharese Handie, Ferris McClain, Britt Little and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Demond Davis v. Sharese Handie, et al
as 21-1100
Defendant / Appellee:
Birc Moreledge, Individual, Lonoke County Public Defender, Bridgette Rappold, Individual, Lonoke County DHS Supervisor, Robby Golden, Individual, Lonoke County Public Defender and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Demond Davis
Davis v. Handie et al
as 4:2020cv01432
Defendant:
J Ramm, Bridgette Rappold, Rob Berry and others
Plaintiff:
Demond Davis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Constitution Pipeline Company, LLC v. A Permanent Easement for 2.40 Acres And Temporary Easements for 3.13 Acres in Davenport, Deleware County, New York, Tax Parcel Number 25.-1-5 et al
as 3:2014cv02046
Plaintiff:
Constitution Pipeline Company, LLC
Defendant:
A Permanent Easement for 2.40 Acres And Temporary Easements for 3.13 Acres in Davenport, Deleware County, New York, Tax Parcel Number 25.-1-5, Barbara Elmore, Chevron U.S.A., Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717
Elmore v. Horace Mann Insurance Co
as 1:2008cv01590
Plaintiff:
Barbara Elmore
Defendant:
Teachers Insurance Co
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Elmore v. General Revenue Corporation et al
as 0:2007cv01638
Plaintiff:
Barbara Elmore
Defendant:
John Doe, National Enterprise Systems Inc. and National Enterprise Systems Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
