Cases 1 - 10 of 35
Watkins v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv03317
Plaintiff:
Barbara Watkins
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Watkins v. Moody et al
as 1:2021cv05260
Plaintiff:
Barbara Watkins
Defendant:
Freeman Moody, Latoya Carr, Sandra Parker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Watkins v. City of Covington, Georgia et al
as 1:2021cv04365
Plaintiff:
Warren Cortiss and Barbara Watkins
Defendant:
City of Covington, Georgia, Officer Kinsley Nichols, Officer Brandon Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WATKINS v. COOK INCORPORATED et al
as 1:2019cv01058
Defendant:
COOK INCORPORATED, COOK MEDICAL LLC and WILLIAM COOK EUROPE APS
Plaintiff:
BARBARA WATKINS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Fisher et al v. TAKEDA PHARMACEUTICALS USA, INC. et al
as 2:2018cv08615
Plaintiff:
Eugene Fisher , STEVE GIROUX , Cloyd Holmes, Jr. and others
Defendant:
TAKEDA PHARMACEUTICALS U.S.A. INC, TAKEDA PHARMACEUTICALS AMERICA INC., TAKEDA PHARMACEUTICALS LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Fisher et al v. TAKEDA PHARMACEUTICALS USA, INC. et al
as CAC/2:18-cv-03073
Plaintiff:
Eugene Fisher , Steve Giroux , Cloyd Holmes, Jr. and others
Defendant:
Takeda Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. , Takeda Pharmaceuticals America, Inc. , Takeda Pharmaceuticals LLC and others
Watkins v. Ruby Tuesday Inc
as 3:2017cv00200
Plaintiff:
Barbara Watkins
Defendant:
Ruby Tuesday Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 15-11262
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv02130
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Floyd Hamilton, III v. Shivani Negi, et al
as 14-30328
Plaintiff - Appellant:
FLOYD HAMILTON, III
Defendant - Appellee:
SHIVANI NEGI, HOLLIS REED, BARBARA WATKINS and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
