Cases 1 - 10 of 605
Joshua Robinson v. Seay et al
as 6:2024cv02136
Plaintiff:
Joshua Lynn Robinson
Defendant:
David Seay, Brian Johnson, Anthony Basile and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Tiwaz v. Ceresini et al
as 1:2024cv00386
Plaintiff:
Miss Tiwaz, Sir Tiwaz, Cea Gleanbead Mai and others
Defendant:
Scott Ceresini, Captain Scott Bradley, Wise and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Barrett v. Oregon Dep't of Corrections, et al.
as 6:2024cv00417
Plaintiff:
S.J. Barrett
Defendant:
Oregon Dep't of Corrections, et al.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jordan v. Barves et al
as 4:2024cv00356
Plaintiff:
Charles Jerome Jordan
Defendant:
J. Barves, J. Pumphrey, Lt. Bardo and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Grimes v. State of Nevada et al
as 3:2024cv00099
Plaintiff:
Orvil Grimes
Defendant:
State of Nevada, Bensen, Barrett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Russell v. Malay et al
as 3:2024cv00094
Plaintiff:
Jamelle Russell
Defendant:
Malay, Breitenbach, Childers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hillman v. Hillman et al
as 9:2024cv00021
Plaintiff:
Danny A. Hillman
Defendant:
Michelle Hillman, Diane Robinson, Sugar Tiffany Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Phillips v. Barrett et al
as 4:2024cv00047
Plaintiff:
Clint Phillips, III
Defendant:
Officer Unknown Barrett and City of Bellefountaine Neighbors
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Soliman v. Melbourne Police Department et al
as 6:2024cv00054
Plaintiff:
Mark Patrick Soliman
Defendant:
Melbourne Police Department, 18th Judicial Circuit Court, State of Florida Office of Attorney General and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
