Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Barry Jones v. Paul Noel, et al
as 22-2992
Plaintiff / Appellant: BARRY JONES
Defendant / Appellee: DR. PAUL NOEL and DR. HARESH PANDYA
Jones vs. Aiken County, South Carolina et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 0:2021cv00681
Plaintiff: Barry Jones
Defendant: Aiken County, South Carolina and Aiken County Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kennedy III et al v. Aiken County, South Carolina et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 0:2021cv00421
Defendant: Aiken County, Aiken County Detention Center and Aiken County, South Carolina
Plaintiff: Barry Jones, Diaz Guillermo Jr., Ronald K. Kennedy III and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. Noel et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2019cv00004
Defendant: Dr. Paul Noel and Dr. Haresh Pandya
Plaintiff: Barry Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. State of Maryland et al
as 1:2018cv00413
Petitioner: Stephen Barry Jones, Jr.
Respondent: Brian Frosh and Richard Dovey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Jones v. Tritt et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2016cv01537
Plaintiff: Barry Jones
Defendant: Brenda Tritt, Downs, Hardwood and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Barry Jones v. Superintendent Frackville SCI, et al
as 15-2608
Plaintiff - Appellant: BARRY JONES
Defendant - Appellee: SUPERINTENDENT FRACKVILLE SCI, DISTRICT ATTORNEY PHILADELPHIA and ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA
Jones v. USA
as 1:2015cv00008
Respondent: USA
Petitioner: Barry Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Jones v. Emanuel et al
as 1:2014cv04496
Plaintiff: Barry Jones
Defendant: Rahm Emanuel, Thom Dart and Cermak Health Care Services
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JONES v. BRUNO
as 2:2012cv03320
Plaintiff: BARRY JONES
Defendant: JAMES S. BRUNO
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?