Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Barthe v. Richland County, South Carolina et al
as 3:2026cv03506
Plaintiff:
Gregg Edmond Barthe
Defendant:
Richland County, South Carolina, Sheriff Leon Lott, Deputy Gregory Parker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Greene v. Ramelb et al
as 3:2026cv00287
Plaintiff:
Jeffery M. V. Greene
Defendant:
Michael A. Ramelb, Micaela Belz, Corey A. Adkins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Barth v. Uplift, Inc. et al
as 2:2026cv02562
Plaintiff:
Brian Barth
Defendant:
Uplift, Inc., Upgrade, Inc. and Renaud Laplanche
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Barth v. Uplift, Inc. et al
as 2:2026at01238
Plaintiff:
Brian Barth
Defendant:
Uplift, Inc., Upgrade, Inc. and Renaud Laplanche
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Sankona Graham vs. A Amacker, et al
as 2:2026cv01859
Plaintiff:
Sankona Graham
Defendant:
Amanda Amacker, B. Silber, Estill and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 26-2294
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Intl Assoc of Machinists and Aerospace Workers v. Barth Industries Company, LP
as 26-3364
Plaintiff:
INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF MACHINISTS AND AEROSPACE WORKERS LOCAL 1297
Defendant:
BARTH INDUSTRIES COMPANY, LP
PEREZ v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA et al
as 1:2026cv01242
Defendant:
DC CHARTER SCHOOL ALLIANCE, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, WENDY KOPP and others
Plaintiff:
SHANIQUE PEREZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
John Barth v. Mabry Carlton Ranch, Inc, et al
as 26-11035
Defendant:
MABRY CARLTON RANCH, INC, LONGINO RANCH INC, BERRYMAN LONGINO, JR. and others
Unknown:
SERVICE
Plaintiff:
JOHN BARTH
Hargrove v. Johnston et al
as 3:2026cv00191
Petitioner:
John E. Hargrove, Jr.
Respondent:
Acting Warden Johnston, Counselor Meton, Counselor Bartimiss and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
