Cases 31 - 40 of 82
BAUDER v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv30843
Plaintiff:
DAVID BAUDER
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2020cv00093
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
(PC) Mills v. Pfeffer et al
as 1:2020cv00195
Defendant:
Moore, Shaka Senghor, S. Silva and others
Plaintiff:
Darryl Ray Mills
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2019cv02147
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Bauder v. Fudge
as 19-6162
Defendant / Appellee:
DELYNN FUDGE, in her individual and official capacities as Executive Director of the Oklahoma Parole Board
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DANIEL COLLINS BAUDER
(PC) Gilmore v. Pfieffer et al
as 1:2019cv01229
Defendant:
Castillo, Bauder, Seals and others
Plaintiff:
Edward Da'Juan Gilmore
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bauder v. Fudge et al
as 5:2019cv00758
Defendant:
Delynn Fudge
Plaintiff:
Daniel Collins Bauder
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cherryl Kirilenko-Ison, et al v. Bd of Ed Danville Independent
as 19-5767
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SUSAN BAUDER-SMITH and CHERRYL KIRILENKO-ISON
Defendant / Appellee:
BOARD OF EDUCATION OF DANVILLE INDEPENDENT SCHOOLS
Federal Insurance Company v. Coral Cay Condominium Council of Co-Owners, Inc. et al
as 5:2019cv00847
Defendant:
Robert Lehman, Robert Gloden, William Bauder and others
Plaintiff:
Federal Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BAUDER v. ABBOTT LABORATORIES et al
as 2:2019cv11959
Plaintiff:
SANDRA BAUDER
Defendant:
ABBOTT LABORATORIES, TAKEDA PHARMACEUTICALS USA, INC., TAKEDA DEVELOPMENT CENTER AMERICAS, INC. F/K/A TAKEDA GLOBAL RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT CENTER, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
