Cases 21 - 30 of 1,123
Bruce Parker v. Stephen Meiko, et al
as 23-2044
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BRUCE PARKER
Defendant / Appellee:
STEPHEN MEIKO, in his individual capacity as a Registered Nurse for Michigan Department of Corrections, CATHERINE S. BAUMAN, in her individual capacity as Warden of Alger Correctional Facility, DOUG TASSON, in his individual capacity as Deputy Warden for Alger Correctional Facility and others
Bauman v. Brooks
as 2:2023cv00596
Plaintiff:
LiJuah Bauman
Defendant:
Micheal Brooks
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Paul BernardIn re: Paul Bernard
as 23-2031
Petitioner:
In re: PAUL ALLEN BERNARD
Respondent:
CATHERINE S. BAUMAN, Warden
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2023cv05825
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12117 Americans with Disabilities Act
Rodney Kennard v. Catherine Bauman
as 23-1984
Petitioner / Appellant:
RODNEY KENNARD
Respondent / Appellee:
CATHERINE S. BAUMAN
Brian WarrenIn re: Brian Warren
as 23-1983
Petitioner:
In re: BRIAN ANDR'E WARREN
Respondent:
CATHERINE S. BAUMAN, Warden
Parker #593090 v. Mieko et al
as 2:2023cv00213
Plaintiff:
Bruce Parker #593090
Defendant:
Stephen Mieko, Catherine Bauman, Doug Tasson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bernard #536729 v. Bauman
as 2:2023cv00195
Petitioner:
Paul Allen Bernard #536729
Respondent:
Catherine Bauman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jackson #185313 v. Bauman
as 2:2023cv00193
Petitioner:
Maurice Jackson #185313
Respondent:
Catherine Bauman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
BAUMAN v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv21741
Plaintiff:
JOSHUA BAUMAN
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
