Cases 21 - 30 of 5,688
Bell v. Leavenworth Penitentiary
as 4:2024cv04055
Petitioner:
Orlando Bell
Respondent:
Leavenworth Penitentiary
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Coons v. Semple et al
as 3:2024cv00534
Plaintiff:
Steven Coons
Defendant:
Semple, Arnone, Cepelak and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McDONALD v. MARSH et al
as 1:2024cv00091
Plaintiff:
JOHN MAURICE McDONALD
Defendant:
ROBERT MARSH, SUPERINTENDENT RANDY IRWIN, MAJOR DEAL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
WEST v. D'ANGELO et al
as 1:2024cv04363
Plaintiff:
KENNETH J. WEST, JR.
Defendant:
TPR J. D'ANGELO, DSFC G. WREN, DET II M. RIBCHINSKY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bell v. Divenuti et al
as 1:2024cv00492
Plaintiff:
Alphonso Bell
Defendant:
Bein Divenuti, Martin and Landy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Troy v. Galipeau et al
as 1:2024cv00131
Plaintiff:
Ramel Theodore Troy, Ramel T. Troy and Ramel Troy
Defendant:
Niraj Bhalakia, J. Galipeau, Gary Lewis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Troy v. Galipeau et al
as 3:2024cv00275
Plaintiff:
Ramel Theodore Troy, Ramel T. Troy and Ramel Troy
Defendant:
Niraj Bhalakia, J. Galipeau, Gary Lewis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Moussa Diarra v. Bell, et al
as 24-10944
Plaintiff:
MOUSSA U'NRA DIARRA
Defendant:
BELL, HOOD and DEKALB COUNTY SHERIFF
Bridges v. Semple et al
as 3:2024cv00452
Plaintiff:
David Bridges
Defendant:
Semple, Arnone, Angel Quiros and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Trent v. Duplin County Jail et al
as 5:2024ct03074
Plaintiff:
Christopher Trent and Kendra Belle Trent
Defendant:
Duplin County Jail, Captain Hanchey and Southern Health Partners
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
