Cases 1 - 10 of 56
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2024cv00546
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Hernandez et al v. Keller Brothers, Inc. et al
as 8:2024cv00253
Plaintiff:
SONIA HERNANDEZ, BLANCA MENJIVAR and SIDIA BELTRAN
Defendant:
KELLER BROTHERS, INC., FERVAS CONSTRUCTION LLC, GREEN GENERATION LANDSCAPING & DESIGN, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv00202
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
US v. Ivan Medina-Beltran
as 23-4653
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
IVAN LEONARDO MEDINA-BELTRAN
Beltran v. Holzapfel
as 5:2023hc02223
Petitioner:
Hilario Renato Mendoza Beltran and Hilario Mendoza Beltran
Respondent:
Warden William Holzapfel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Beltran Bey v. Howell et al
as 5:2023cv00175
Plaintiff:
Brother Beltran Bey
Defendant:
Lolo Lolita Brown Howell and Aubrey Bridges
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00642
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-7471
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 9:2022cv03974
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12117 Americans with Disabilities Act
McLaughlin et al v. Onslow County Board of Elections et al
as 7:2022cv00171
Plaintiff:
joseph robert mclaughlin, lori ready-digiovanni and juan carlos beltran
Defendant:
onslow county board of elections, jason dedmond, michael a morgan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
