Cases 41 - 50 of 506
Kavazanjian v. Doe et al
as 5:2023cv00378
Plaintiff:
Richard A. Kavazanjian
Defendant:
John Doe, Jim Doe, Jay Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Friday v. Carver et al
as 5:2023ct03140
Plaintiff:
Tevin Damato Friday
Defendant:
Warden Ben Carver, Asst. Warden Cothran, Caroline Watson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
NEAL v. ANDERSON
as 1:2023cv00285
Petitioner:
GLENN WHICKER NEAL, JR.
Respondent:
BEN ANDERSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
NEAL v. ANDERSON
as 1:2023cv00284
Petitioner:
GLENN WHICKER NEAL, JR.
Respondent:
BEN ANDERSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Albert Anderson v. Lee
as 23-6269
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ALBERT ANDERSON
Defendant / Appellee:
LEE, Facility Classification Coordinator, SALISBURY CORRECTIONAL INSITUTION, Prison, RITHIE, Facility Classification Coordinator and others
Weintraub v. Alan et al
as 1:2023cv00737
Plaintiff:
Ross Weintraub
Defendant:
Gold D. Alan, Paul Smithers, Catherine Hastings and others
Dowdy v. Stevenson et al
as 1:2023cv00323
Plaintiff:
Markus Dowdy
Defendant:
Ben Stevenson, Frederick Abello, Lt Rowe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Crow v. Culbreath et al
as 5:2023cv00801
Plaintiff:
Pamela Crow
Defendant:
Carlos Culbreath, Tony Breeden, Monica Parker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr (Other)
Ballin v. Shepler
as 5:2023cv00038
Petitioner:
Matthew James Ballin
Respondent:
Randolph County Magistrate Ben E. Shepler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Johnson v. Warden of FCI Bennettsville
as 5:2023cv00507
Petitioner:
Stephan A Johnson
Respondent:
Bureau of Prisons & Acting Warden of FCI - Ben and Warden of FCI Bennettsville
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
