Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Goldstein et al v. Henry et al
as 2:2024cv00786
Plaintiff:
Alex Goldstein, Scott Whittington and Armour LLC doing business as Redneck Wine Company
Defendant:
Ben Henry and Kris Mayes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Henry et al v. Borchardt
as 1:2023cv00213
Plaintiff:
Elaine Henry and Ben Henry
Defendant:
Cole Borchardt
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Libel,Assault,Slander
Reed Day, et al v. Ben Henry, et al
as 23-16148
Plaintiff / Appellant:
REED DAY and ALBERT JACOBS
Defendant / Appellee:
BEN HENRY, in his official capacity as Director of the Arizona Department of Liquor Licenses and Control, TROY CAMPBELL, Chair, Arizona State Liquor Board, in their official capacities and KRIS MAYES, in her official capacity as Arizona Attorney General
Intervenor Defendant / Appellee:
WINE AND SPIRITS WHOLESALERS ASSOCIATION OF ARIZONA
Evenstad v. Lynden et al
as 0:2023cv00498
Plaintiff:
Thomas Evenstad
Defendant:
Tom Lynden, A.J. Lague, Eric Chaleaux and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
MAXWELL et al v. ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN
as 1:2022cv00173
Plaintiff:
ANDREA LYNN MEYERS, BEN HENRY MAXWELL, EUNICE MAXINE WOODY and others
Defendant:
ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1605 A Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act
Ben Scott v. Jason Kent, Warden
as 20-30458
Respondent / Appellee:
Jason Kent, Warden, Dixon Correctional Institute
Petitioner / Appellant:
Ben Henry Scott
Scott v. Kent et al
as 2:2020cv01889
Plaintiff:
Ben Henry Scott
Respondent:
Attorney General State of Louisiana
Defendant:
Jason Kent
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Scott v. Kent et al
as 3:2020cv00183
Respondent:
Jeff Landry and Jason Kent
Petitioner:
Ben Henry Scott
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Scott v. Turner
as 3:2018cv00626
Plaintiff:
Ben Henry Scott
Defendant:
Keith Turner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
