Cases 21 - 30 of 47
Slayton v. City of River Rouge et al
as 2:2017cv13875
Plaintiff:
Dominique Slayton
Defendant:
City of River Rouge, City of Wyandotte, Edward Otis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. Game Changing Benefits Inc et al
as 3:2017cv02902
Plaintiff:
Benjamin Jones
Defendant:
Bilal Hamideh and Game Changing Benefits Inc
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 754
Sharon Marchman v. Brian Crawford, et al
as 17-30200
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SHARON INGRAM MARCHMAN
Defendant - Appellee:
BRIAN E. CRAWFORD, LAWRENCE W. PETTIETTE, JR., JAMES D. CALDWELL and others
Zholton Hendrix-El v. State of Louisiana, et al
as 16-30925
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ZHOLTON CORNILUS HENDRIX-EL
Defendant - Appellee:
STATE OF LOUISIANA, MOREHOUSE PARISH 4TH DISTRICT COURT, BENJAMIN JONES, Court Administrator and others
Jones v. United States of America
as 6:2016cv00076
Petitioner:
Paul Benjamin Jones
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Hendrix-El v. Louisiana et al
as 3:2016cv00708
Defendant:
State of Louisiana, Morehouse Parish 4th District Court, Benjamin Jones and others
Plaintiff:
Zholton Cornilus Hendrix-El
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Marchman v. Crawford et al
as 3:2016cv00515
Plaintiff:
Sharon Ingram Marchman
Defendant:
Brian E Crawford , Lawrence W Pettiette, Jr , James D Caldwell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Christopher v. Jones
as 3:2016cv00411
Plaintiff:
Lemerick Vernell Christopher, Sr
Defendant:
Benjamin Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
US v. Robert Jones
as 16-6312
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
ROBERT BENJAMIN JONES
Jones v. Janssen Research & Development LLC et al
as 2:2016cv00604
Defendant:
Janssen Ortho LLC, Johnson & Johnson Company, Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Benjamin Jones and Walter Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
