Cases 1 - 10 of 56
Diaz v. State of Hawaii et al
as 1:2026cv00002
Plaintiff:
Eugene Anthony Diaz
Defendant:
State of Hawaii, City and County of Honolulu, Department Health State of Hawaii and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ryder v. Scott
as 3:2025cv00792
Plaintiff:
Nelson Ryder
Defendant:
Benjamin Scott
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Scott v. Commissioner of the Social Security
as 3:2025cv00439
Plaintiff:
Benjamin Scott
Defendant:
Commissioner of the Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
JACKSON et al v. ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN
as 1:2024cv02304
Plaintiff:
MINNIE LEE JACKSON, ESTATE OF MARY IDA BRANCH, ANDREW JAMES GANDERT and others
Defendant:
ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1605 A Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act
Scott v. O'Malley
as 4:2023cv04768
Plaintiff:
Benjamin Scott
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi and Martin O'Malley
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration-Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
PARKS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2023cv23403
Plaintiff:
BENJAMIN SCOTT PARKS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Gurdine v. Mason et al
as 1:2023cv00262
Plaintiff:
Lamar Gurdine
Defendant:
Bernadette Mason, Jeanne Macknight and Benjamin Scott
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Scott v. Vance et al
as 4:2022cv00985
Plaintiff:
Benjamin Scott
Defendant:
Ray Vance, Will Donaham, Matt Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SCOTT v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv19502
Plaintiff:
BENJAMIN SCOTT
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
TAYLOR v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv14210
Plaintiff:
BENJAMIN SCOTT TAYLOR
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
