Cases 1 - 10 of 174
Bentz et al v. Mergenthaler et al
as 3:2024cv00025
Plaintiff:
Karin A Bentz and Law Offices of Karin A. Bentz, P.C.
Defendant:
Joshua Mergenthaler and Ashley Pech
Cause Of Action: 23 U.S.C. § 134 P.I.- Auto Negligence
Bentz v. Marion, Kansas, City of et al
as 2:2024cv02120
Plaintiff:
Cheri Bentz
Defendant:
Marion, Kansas, City of, David Mayfield, Gideon Cody and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
(PC) Rodriguez v. Covello et al
as 2:2023cv02394
Plaintiff:
Javier Rodriguez and Javier Alexander Rodriguez
Defendant:
Patrick Covello, A. Bustamante, R. Decker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BENTZ v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv10635
Plaintiff:
JEROME M BENTZ
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
BENTZ v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2023cv21672
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL BENTZ
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Etheredge et al v. Yost et al
as 3:2023cv01497
Plaintiff:
Christine Amber Etheredge
Defendant:
Attorney General Yost, State of Ohio, Ada Police and others
3Rd Party Plaintiff:
Emily Beebe
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241 Conspiracy Against Citizen Rights
(PC) Cross v. Covello et al
as 2:2023cv00336
Plaintiff:
Quintin R. Cross
Defendant:
Patrick Covello, E. Hobbs, Barajas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Andrews v. Adams et al
as 1:2023cv00095
Plaintiff:
Dessie Andrews
Defendant:
Alma S. Adams, Current and Former Members of Congress, Robert B Aderholt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bentz v. Manton et al
as 3:2023cv03005
Plaintiff:
David Robert Bentz
Defendant:
. Manton, . Huston, M Warden and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
