Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Robinson v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2023cv00021
Plaintiff:
Beth Robinson
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
SSA Noticing and US Attorney-Social Security Noticing
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 206 Social Security Benefits
Levitt v. Indelicato et al
as 3:2022cv00055
Plaintiff:
Alfred Levitt
Defendant:
Stephen Indelicato, Jennillee Beth Robinson and M/V St. Somewhere
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333 Admiralty
Bedell v. Menard et al
as 5:2016cv00292
Plaintiff:
Clinton Bedell
Defendant:
Lisa Menard, Amber Gibbs, Rick Byrne and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv00596
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2617
Robinson v. Life Care Centers of America
as 4:2015cv03675
Plaintiff:
Beth Robinson
Defendant:
Life Care Centers of America
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Clayton v. Savannah Chatham Metropolitan Police Department et al
as 4:2015cv00093
Plaintiff:
Alexandria M. Clayton
Defendant:
Savannah Chatham Metropolitan Police Department, Randy Veal, Clarence Few and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Allen Bennett v. Chad Sensor, et al
as 15-1757
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ALLEN J. BENNETT
Defendant - Appellee:
CHAD A. SENSOR, MARK ROSENTHAL, KIMBERLY A. CRAVER and others
Porter v. Robinson
as 4:2014cv00217
Plaintiff:
Chandra Latrelle Porter
Defendant:
Beth Robinson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Garman v. The City of Savannah, Georgia et al
as 4:2014cv00188
Plaintiff:
Randy E. Garman
Defendant:
The City of Savannah, Georgia, Savannah Chatham Metropolitan Police Department and Beth Robinson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
James Bigglest v. Mayor and Alderman, et al
as 13-12058
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES A. BIGGLEST
Defendant - Appellee:
MAYOR AND ALDERMAN, JOSEPH SHEAROUSE, PEARSON DELOACH and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
