Cases 1 - 10 of 43
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv01484
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
United States of America v. Ayers (Smith)
as 23-7119
Defendant:
DERRICK AYERS, BERMON CLARKE, NIA GOVAN and others
Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
JAMEL SMITH
Roberts v. Biggies et al
as 4:2023cv00288
Plaintiff:
Clarence Roberts
Defendant:
Correctional Officer Biggies, Corrections Nurse Brad and Pennsylvania Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Roberts v. Biggies et al
as 4:2023cv00005
Plaintiff:
Clarence Roberts
Defendant:
Correctional Officer Biggies, Corrections Nurse Brad, D.F. Oberlander and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
US v. Pizzini
as 22-1303
Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Defendant / Appellant:
JULIO J. PIZZINI, a/k/a Biggie, a/k/a Blackie, a/k/a Jose
Interested Party:
LOWELL POLICE DEPARTMENT
United States of America v. Nunez (Santiago)
as 22-662
Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant:
Starlin Nunez, AKA Chino, AKA Lucky Star, AKA Junior, Ramon Martinez, AKA Gordo, Andre Belliard, AKA Little Andy and others
Defendant / Appellant:
David Santiago, AKA Bori
Thomas v. USA
as 2:2021cv01347
Petitioner:
Augustine Bernal Thomas and Biggy
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Biggie v. Sedgwick Claims Management Services, Inc.
as 1:2021cv06488
Plaintiff:
Robert Biggie
Defendant:
Sedgwick Claims Management Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
100 Bank, LLC v. BTC Mall Associates, LLC et al
as 2:2021cv00154
Defendant:
Kim Ianelli, Caitlin Halpert, Bradley M. Biggie and others
Plaintiff:
100 Bank, LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
United States v. Pizzini, et al
as 21-8016
Interested Party:
LOWELL POLICE DEPARTMENT
Petitioner:
JULIO J. PIZZINI, a/k/a Biggie, a/k/a Blackie, a/k/a Jose
Respondent:
UNITED STATES
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
