Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Yearley v. Loves Country Store #285 et al
as 1:2023cv00922
Plaintiff:
Janie Lynn Yearley
Defendant:
Loves Country Store #285, Bill Morrison and Derek Rusinek
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ressel v. ConGlobal Industries, LLC et al
as 2:2021cv02471
Not Classified By Court:
Clerk Bill Morrison
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Allen Ressel
Defendant:
ConGlobal Industries, LLC and Edward Demoll, II
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1001
In Matter Of Rose H. Vernon v. Shelby Cnty, TN Probate Court, et al
as 20-6402
Defendant / Appellee:
SAM POWERS, in his personal capacity, SHELBY COUNTY, TN PROBATE COURT, Division I, Official Capacity, SHELBY COUNTY, TN PROBATE COURT CLERK, Official capacity and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
IN THE MATTER OF ROSE H. VERNON, aka Joseph Dingler and IN THE MATTER OF ROSE H. VERNON, by Joseph Dingler
In Matter Of Rose H. Vernon v. Shelby Cnty, TN Probate Court, et al
as 20-6367
Defendant / Appellee:
SAM POWERS, in his personal capacity, SHELBY COUNTY, TN PROBATE COURT, Division I, Official Capacity, SHELBY COUNTY, TN PROBATE COURT CLERK, Official capacity and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
IN THE MATTER OF ROSE H. VERNON, aka Joseph Dingler and IN THE MATTER OF ROSE H. VERNON, by Joseph Dingler
In the matter of Rose H. Vernon v. Shelby County Probate Court Clerk et al
as 2:2020cv02436
Defendant:
Shelby County Probate Court Clerk, Sam Powers, Shelby County Probate Court and others
Plaintiff:
Joseph Dingler and In the matter of Rose H. Vernon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Morrison v. Hudgins
as 3:2019cv00182
Respondent:
R. Hudgins
Petitioner:
Bill Morrison
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Martin v. Morrison
as 1:2017cv00715
Petitioner:
William A. Martin
Respondent:
Bill Morrison
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Bendickson v. Morrison
as 3:2017cv03086
Plaintiff:
Jason Ivan Bendickson
Defendant:
Bill Morrison
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
