Cases 1 - 10 of 5,300
Cornille v. Myers et al
as 3:2024cv01202
Defendant:
Administrative Review Board, William Loy, Percy Myers and others
Plaintiff:
Bradley J Cornille, Sr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Butler v. Hyatte et al
as 3:2024cv00342
Defendant:
William Hyatte, Bill, Pully and others
Plaintiff:
Imari Butler
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Stange et al
as 1:2024cv00078
Plaintiff:
Stanley Johnson
Defendant:
Bill Stange, Loreen Armstrong, Unknown Wright and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Burleson v. Nettles
as 8:2024cv01896
Plaintiff:
Darriel A Burleson
Defendant:
Bill Nettles
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Bush v. Stange
as 6:2024cv03101
Petitioner:
Jordan Bush
Respondent:
Bill Stange
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
HARDEN et al v. VIGO COUNTY SHERIFF DEPARTMENT et al
as 2:2024cv00113
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER HARDEN, MARVIN STRONG, TONNY COCKRAIL and others
Defendant:
VIGO COUNTY SHERIFF DEPARTMENT, BILL JOY, TGGS CANTINE SERVICES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hamrick (PS) v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 1:2024cv00879
Plaintiff:
Rodney Curtis Hamrick
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons, Andre Matevousian, Barb Von Blanckensee and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Stange
as 1:2024cv00068
Petitioner:
Antione Johnson
Defendant:
Bill Stange
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Makupson v. Lee et al
as 1:2024cv00129
Plaintiff:
Jamie Anthony Makupson
Defendant:
Bill Lee, Glenn Jacobs, Chief Oates and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Davenport v. Baker et al
as 3:2024cv00852
Plaintiff:
Kareem Davenport
Defendant:
Sergeant Baker, C/O Suhro, C/O Schweizer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
