Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 493
USA v. Antonio Billups
as 24-5645
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant: ANTONIO L. BILLUPS
USA v. Antonio Billups
as 24-5644
Defendant: ANTONIO L. BILLUPS
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Blake Billups v. Cody Cammack, et al
as 24-1954
Plaintiff: BLAKE ATLAS BILLUPS
Defendant: CODY CAMMACK, HENRY CUNNINGHAM, AMANDA R. MICHALEK and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00334
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Johnson et al v. The University of Oklahoma et al
as 5:2024cv00495
Defendant: Jeff Blahnik, The University of Oklahoma, Joseph Harroz, Jr. and others
Plaintiff: Logan Rhines, Brayden Johnson and Kayla Savage
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Mustion et al v. 3M Company et al
as 2:2024cv02896
Plaintiff: Zane Mustion, Curtis Wright, Ronald Trotter and others
Defendant: 3M Company, AGC Chemicals Americas Inc, Amerex Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
Mustion et al v. 3M Company et al
as 1:2024cv03079
Plaintiff: Zane Mustion, Curtis Wright, Ronald Trotter and others
Defendant: 3M Company, AGC Chemicals Americas Inc., Amerex Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 nr Notice of Removal
Billups v. USA
as 0:2024cv01479
Petitioner: Brandon Travis Billups
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00074
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Daniel Jamison v. Chadwick Dotson
as 24-6132
Plaintiff: DANIEL W. PHOENIX, a/k/a Daniel W. Jamison
Defendant: CHADWICK DOTSON, Director, Virginia Department of Corrections, MARK AMONETTE, M.D., Chief Medical Officer, NATARCHA GREGG, M.S.A., RD., State Wide Dietician and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?