Cases 61 - 70 of 5,237
Ellis v. Sifuentes et al
as 4:2024cv00080
Plaintiff:
Christian Jamal Ellis
Defendant:
Anthony Sifuentes, Marquis Taylor, L Dunlap and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
USA v. Blair Thomas, Jr.
as 24-1171
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
BLAIR THOMAS, JR.
Krzywkowski v. Mohr et al
as 2:2024cv00374
Plaintiff:
Grady Krzywkowski
Defendant:
Gary Mohr, Mike Davis, Warden Keith Foley and others
Interested Party:
State of Ohio
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pardee et al v. Baker, Donelson, Bearman, Caldwell & Berkowitz et al
as 4:2024cv00033
Plaintiff:
Scott J Pardee, Pardee Construction, LLC, Evolving Communities, LLC and others
Defendant:
Baker, Donelson, Bearman, Caldwell & Berkowitz and Sam Blair
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Blair v. St. Louis County Justice Center
as 4:2024cv00143
Plaintiff:
Jered Christopher Blair
Defendant:
St. Louis County Justice Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
In re: Wendell O'Neal
as 24-10235
Petitioner:
In re: WENDELL DWAYNE O'NEAL
Respondent:
ALLSTATE INDEMNITY INSURANCE COMPANY INC, MORRIS BART LLC, CLAUDE E. HUNDLEY, III and others
In re: Wendell O'Neal
as 24-10252
Petitioner:
In re: WENDELL DWAYNE O'NEAL
Respondent:
ALLSTATE INDEMNITY INSURANCE COMPANY INC, MORRIS BART LLC, CLAUDE E. HUNDLEY, III and others
Blair v. Crawford
as 3:2024cv00075
Plaintiff:
Adaruis Blair
Defendant:
f/n/u Crawford
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Blair-Smith v. Caesars Entertainment, Inc.
as 2:2024cv00169
Plaintiff:
Monica Blair-Smith
Defendant:
Caesars Entertainment Inc
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0045 Federal Trade Commission Act
Dianna Blair, et al v. Charles Schievelhud, et al
as 24-5072
Plaintiff:
DIANNA CHRISTINE BLAIR and VIRGINIA ARLENE GOFORTH
Defendant:
CHARLES STEVEN SCHIEVELHUD and REBECCA STEE SCHIEVELHUD
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
