Cases 1 - 10 of 1,292
BLOOM et al
as 2:2024cv01783
Defendant:
MEDICAL DEPOT, INC. also known as DRIVE MEDICAL doing business as DRIVE DEVILBISS HEALTHCARE and DRIVE MEDICAL
Plaintiff:
SUSAN BLOOM and ARAM BLOOM
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Bloom v. Exactech, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv02983
Plaintiff:
Marilela Bloom
Defendant:
Exactech, Inc. and Exactech US, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Bloom et al v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2024cv01347
Plaintiff:
Barry Bloom and Dorothy Bloom
Defendant:
3M Company and Arizant Healthcare, Inc.
Manko v. Lenox Hill Hospital
as 24-954
Plaintiff:
NELLA MANKO
Defendant:
LENOX HILL HOSPITAL, DANA A. MANNOR, M.D., NEW YORK STATE UNIFIED COURT SYSTEM and others
IPN, LLC v. Bloom et al
as 9:2024cv80453
Plaintiff:
IPN, LLC
Defendant:
Michael Bloom and Safe Payments, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
BLOOM et al v. NATIONAL INDEMNITY COMPANY
as 2:2024cv01506
Plaintiff:
DANIEL BLOOM and HARRIET BLOOM
Defendant:
NATIONAL INDEMNITY COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Grayson v. Equifax Credit Information Services, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv01077
Not Yet Classified:
Eunice Minter Gudger
Plaintiff:
Michael C Grayson
Defendant:
Equifax Credit Information Services, Inc., Seyfarth Shaw, Magistrate Judge Lois Bloom and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal Libel,Assault,Slander
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00220
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Smith, Xavier v. Waxrnan et al
as 1:2024cv21186
Plaintiff:
Xavier Latrell Smith
Defendant:
Abbie Waxrnan, Bertilla Lilla Fernandez, Joshua Youngblood and others
BLOOM v. USA
as 1:2024cv00442
Plaintiff:
JEFFREY J. BLOOM
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491 Tucker Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
