Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Xia et al v. Chen et al
as 2:2026cv08052
Defendant:
Relevant Group LLC, Vincent Chen, Grant W King and others
Plaintiff:
Haixu Xia, Lin Zhu, Yinu Shi and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 m(a) Securities Exchange Act
New York Life Insurance Company v. Li et al
as 1:2026cv03902
Plaintiff:
New York Life Insurance Company
Defendant:
Xiaotong Li, Han Peruzzi and Bo Wang
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Interpleader Action
McCreary v. Stalman
as 26-40409
Plaintiff:
Shawne McCreary
Defendant:
Bo Stalman, Chris Kelly, C. Franko and others
McFerran v. Stallman
as 3:2026cv00217
Petitioner:
Joshua David McFerran
Respondent:
Sheriff Bo Stallman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Markee (ID 2000023881) v. Zmuda et al
as 5:2026cv03218
Plaintiff:
Tracy Alan Markee
Defendant:
Jeff Zmuda, Tommy Williams, Tyler Clark and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
United States v. Jimmie Willis
as 26-2324
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Jimmie Willis, also known as Jimbo, also known as Bo
Carruth v. Sloan et al
as 3:2026cv00186
Plaintiff:
Mitchell Carruth
Defendant:
Jacob Sloan, Matt McClain and Bo McCullom
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2026cv03616
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1105 (a) Aliens: Habeas Corpus to Release INS Detainee
Han et al v. Point Ruston LLC et al
as 3:2026cv05697
Plaintiff:
Bingru Han, Bo Liu, Changjun Gu and others
Defendant:
Point Ruston LLC, Point Ruston Phase II LLC, Loren M Cohen and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2026cv01776
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (IMMIGRATION)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
