Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00186
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Wrongful Termination of Employment
Morris v. Boasso America Corporation
as 1:2022cv04178
Plaintiff:
David Morris
Defendant:
Boasso America Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Motor Vehicle
Nolan v. Cage et al
as 2:2022cv02101
Not Classified By Court:
Kathy Blount
Plaintiff:
Stanley Nolan, II
Defendant:
Quentin Cage and Boasso America Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Nolan v. Cage et al
as 1:2022cv02101
Not Classified By Court:
Kathy Blount
Plaintiff:
Stanley Nolan, II
Defendant:
Quentin Cage and Boasso America Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Quality Carriers, Inc. et al v. Intercontinental Terminals Company, LLC et al
as 4:2021cv00889
Defendant:
Intercontinental Terminals Company, LLC, NSK Precision America, Inc., Applied Industrial Technologies, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Boasso America Corporation and Quality Carriers, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv19256
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv19241
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Frieda v. Boasso America Corporation
as 4:2019cv00290
Defendant:
Boasso America Corporation
Plaintiff:
Lolley Frieda
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
DOGLIO v. BOASSO AMERICA CORPORATION
as 2:2018cv13448
Plaintiff:
MARCOS D DOGLIO
Defendant:
BOASSO AMERICA CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
King v. Boasso America Corporation et al
as 2:2017cv00491
Plaintiff:
John T. King, III, CZA
Defendant:
Boasso America Corporation and Mid-Atlantic Leasing Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
