Cases 1 - 10 of 21,006
Turner v. City of Clanton Alabama et al
as 2:2024cv00299
Plaintiff:
Bobby Joe Turner
Defendant:
City of Clanton Alabama, Chilton County, Alabama, Austin Turner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Wopschall v. Wilkens et al
as 1:2024cv00503
Plaintiff:
Bobby Wopschall
Defendant:
FNU Wilkens, Jacob O. and Alisha Tafoya
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2024cv03913
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12111 Americans with Disabilities Act - Employment
Salinas v. Lumpkin
as 4:2024cv01917
Petitioner:
John Thomas Salinas
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Palmer v. Lumpkin
as 24-20215
Petitioner:
Scott Edward Palmer
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Rodriguez v. Lumpkin
as 24-50392
Petitioner:
Jesus Rodriguez
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
OPVHHJV LLC et al v. Weatherly et al
as 1:2024cv02201
Plaintiff:
OPVHHJV LLC doing business as Pathlight Property Management and HPA JV Borrower 2019-1 ATH LLC
Defendant:
Tracy Weatherly and Bobby Weatherly
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal - Breach of Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv05037
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 American with Disabilities Act
Hughes v. Lumpkin
as 4:2024cv01897
Petitioner:
Darren Tramell Hughes
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Gutierrez v. Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID
as 4:2024cv01902
Petitioner:
Leonardo Gutierrez
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
