Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Cummings v. Ford et al
as 1:2018cv00164
Plaintiff:
Charles Alvin Cummings, Jr
Defendant:
David, Bobby Hicks, Vanetta and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
George Preston v. Bobby Hicks, et al
as 16-30961
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GEORGE ANDREW PRESTON
Defendant - Appellee:
BOBBY HICKS, LIEUTENANT W. BOWIE, SERGEANT AUGUSTINE and others
Preston v. Hicks et al
as 1:2016cv00562
Plaintiff:
George Andrew Preston
Defendant:
Bobby Hicks, W Bowie, Augustine and others
Garnishee:
Dauzat
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hicks et al v. Ampacet Ohio, LLC et al
as 2:2016cv00182
Plaintiff:
Bobby Hicks and Bryan Fleshman
Defendant:
Ampacet Ohio, LLC and Ampacet Sales Corporation
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1938
Fulmer v. City of Stevenson, Alabama et al
as 5:2016cv00154
Plaintiff:
David Fulmer
Defendant:
City of Stevenson, Alabama , Daniel Winters, Darren McCamey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hill v. Cain et al
as 1:2015cv02721
Plaintiff:
James Hill
Defendant:
Nathan Cain and Bobby Hicks
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2015cv01262
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Hicks v. Grand River Navigation Company, Inc.
as 1:2010cv02862
Defendant:
Grand River Navigation Company, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Bobby Hicks, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688
Hicks v. Grand River Navigation Company, Inc. CASE TRANSFERRED
as 4:2010cv13375
Defendant:
Grand River Navigation Company, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Bobby Hicks, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688
ELMORE et al v. AC AND S, INC.(ARMSTRONG CONTRACTING & SUPPLY) et al
as 2:2010cv62605
Defendant:
AC AND S, INC.(ARMSTRONG CONTRACTING & SUPPLY), ASBESTOSPRAY CORP., FOSTER WHEELER CORPORATION and others
Plaintiff:
AARON HICKS and BOBBIE HICKS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
