Cases 1 - 10 of 23
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv02292
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
US v. Bobby Burch
as 20-4249
Defendant / Appellant:
BOBBY ROGER BURCH, a/k/a Rob Patterson, a/k/a Rob Bob
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Rogers et al v. Gardner
as 6:2019cv00079
Plaintiff:
Richard Rogers and Bobbie Rogers
Defendant:
Jimmy Weldon Gardner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
ROGERS v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2018cv15065
In Re:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Defendant:
IMERYS TALC AMERICA, INC., JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER INC. and JOHNSON & JOHNSON
Plaintiff:
BOBBI ROGERS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Rogers v. Johnson & Johnson et al
as 3:2018cv14352
Defendant:
PERSONAL CARE PRODUCTS COUNCIL, JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER INC, JOHNSON & JOHNSON and others
Plaintiff:
Bobbi Rogers
In Re:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Rogers v. Johnson & Johnson et al
as 5:2018cv00863
Defendant:
Personal Care Products Council, Johnson & Johnson Consumer Inc, Johnson & Johnson and others
Plaintiff:
Bobbi Rogers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv06303
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Lane v. Thomas, et al (INMATE 3)
as 1:2013cv00490
Plaintiff:
Bobby Rogers Lane
Defendant:
Kim T. Thomas, Luther Strange and Kenneth Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Rogers et al v. Overton Brooks VA Medical Center
as 3:2013cv00922
Plaintiff:
Bobby Rogers, Jeanie Rogers and Clarence Rogers
Defendant:
Overton Brooks VA Medical Center
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Medical Malpractice
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
