Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Rocky N. Boice v. Brian Birkholz
as 2:2024cv01963
Petitioner:
Rocky N. Boice, Jr.
Respondent:
Brian Birkholz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv01935
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Barracliffe v. Fortney et al
as 2:2020cv01024
Defendant:
Adam Fortney, Arthur Wallin, Jack Yilmaz and others
Plaintiff:
Paul Barracliffe II and Paul Barracliffe, II
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Boice v. Fortees Salon & Spa LLC et al
as 2:2019cv04484
Defendant:
Fortees Salon & Spa LLC, InfinitiHR West LLC and Edward Osunlalu
Plaintiff:
Yukino Angela Boice
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Boice v. Allstate Property and Casualty Insurance Company
as 2:2018cv00378
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Boice
Defendant:
Allstate Property and Casualty Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv02938
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2016cv00997
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Reman v. Douglas County et al
as 6:2015cv02309
Defendant:
Chris Boice, Douglas County, Tim Freeman and others
Petitioner:
Ida-Lee Rudolph Reman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
United States of America v. Miscellaneous Jewelry and Precious Items et al
as 2:2014cv02245
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Miscellaneous Jewelry and Precious Items, Miscellaneous Artwork, Miscellaneous Furniture and Household Items and others
Claimant:
Deborah Boice Hoover
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Nguyen Pahm v. John A Boice et al
as 5:2013cv01050
Defendant:
John A Boice, Wendy L Boice and Does
Plaintiff:
Nguyen Pahm
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
