Cases 21 - 30 of 286
(HC) Carlos-Tofolla v. Brewer
as 2:2022cv01742
Petitioner:
Bonifacio Carlos-Tofolla
Respondent:
David Brewer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv05097
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Deric Lostutter, et al v. KY, et al
as 22-5703
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DERIC JAMES LOSTUTTER, ROBERT CALVIN LANGDON and BONIFACIO R. ALEMAN
Defendant:
COMMONWEALTH OF KENTUCKY
Defendant / Appellee:
ANDREW G. BESHEAR, in his official capacity as Governor of Kentucky
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv03817
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv04646
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Garcia Rangel v. Garland
as 22-943
Petitioner:
JOSE BONIFACIO GARCIA RANGEL
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Gorostieta-Casas v. Warden
as 2:2022cv01244
Plaintiff:
Bonifacio Gorostieta-Casas and Gregorio Gorostieta-Casas
Defendant:
Warden and Warden F C I - Oakdale II
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Bonifacio v. Bank of Guam
as 1:2022cv00008
Plaintiff:
Eusebio B Bonifacio and Eusebio B. Bonifacio, Jr.
Defendant:
Bank of Guam
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract
AVILA et al v. HOPPES et al
as 1:2022cv00614
Plaintiff:
BONIFACIO AVILA and HOLLY AVILA
Defendant:
KELSEY HOPPES, LAURA HOUSTON and JAYDA MONTEIRO
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Gorostieta-Casas v. Federal Correctional Institution Oakdale II
as 2:2022cv00652
Plaintiff:
Bonifacio Gorostieta-Casas
Respondent:
Federal Correctional Institution Oakdale II
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
