Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv01151
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Haslinger et al v. Boral Bricks, Inc. et al
as 3:2013cv02668
Plaintiff:
Karl A Haslinger , Trina A Haslinger and Essex Homes Southeast Inc
Defendant:
Boral Bricks, Inc. and Hoffman Enterprises, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
United States Of America et al v. Airgas Carbonic, Inc. et al
as 1:2011cv00163
Defendant:
Coca-Cola USA, Vital Pharma, Inc, ABC Compounding Company, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
United States Of America and State of Georgia
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 9607 Real Property Tort to Land
Browning v. Boral Bricks, Inc. et al
as 2:2011cv00168
Plaintiff:
Steven E. Browning
Defendant:
Boral Bricks, Inc. and John Does 1-4
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Oviedo v. Boral Industries, Inc. et al
as 2:2011cv00349
Plaintiff:
Maria Molina Oviedo
Defendant:
Boral Industries, Inc. and Boral Bricks, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Griffin v. Boral Bricks Inc
as 2:2009cv00271
Plaintiff:
Grady Griffin
Defendant:
Boral Bricks Inc
Cause Of Action: 23 U.S.C. § 134 P.I.- Auto Negligence
Colony Insurance Company v. Sabellona et al
as 1:2009cv00536
Plaintiff:
Colony Insurance Company and Colony Insurance Company
Defendant:
Richard Sabellona, III, Scott P. Sabellona, Brandon N. Sabellona and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgement (Insurance)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2008cv00213
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2008cv00399
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2007cv00647
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
