Cases 1 - 10 of 58
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-3763
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Harihar v. Jeanne D'Arc Credit Union, et al
as 23-1710
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MOHAN A. HARIHAR
Defendant / Appellee:
JEANNE D'ARC CREDIT UNION and SANDRA BOULAY, Esq., Boulay Law Firm, LLC
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv03052
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Harihar v. Jeanne D' Arc Credit Union et al
as 1:2022cv11648
Plaintiff:
Pro Se Party Mohan A. Harihar
Defendant:
Jeanne D' Arc Credit Union and Sandra Boulay
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Makowski et al v. United States of America et al
as 8:2022cv02243
Plaintiff:
Joseph Makowski and Chanty Makowski
Defendant:
United States of America, Obi Agborbesong, Scott Hewitt and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1402 Medical Malpractice
BOULAIS v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv18847
Plaintiff:
JUSTIN RYAN BOULAIS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
McMillan v. United States Department of Justice
as 2:2022cv00174
Plaintiff:
Peter A McMillan
Defendant:
United States Department of Justice, United States Drug Enforcement Administration, United States Marshals Service and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Haribar v. Jeanne D'Arc Credit Union, et al
as 21-1953
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MOHAN A. HARIBAR
Defendant / Appellee:
JEANNE D'ARC CREDIT UNION and SANDRA BOULAY, Esq., Boulay Law Firm, LLC
BOULAY v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv36068
Plaintiff:
JAMES M BOULAY
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Diane Boulais Dalphond et al v. Princess Cruise Lines, Ltd.
as 2:2021cv00927
Plaintiff:
Pierre Duval and Diane Boulais Dalphond
Defendant:
Princess Cruise Lines, Ltd.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333 Admiralty
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
