Cases 21 - 30 of 3,678
United States of America v. Bowers
as 4:2024mc50285
Petitioner:
United States of America
Respondent:
James Bowers
Crenshaw v. Edmond et al
as 3:2024cv00372
Plaintiff:
Darryl Crenshaw
Defendant:
Edmond, Bowers and Daugherty
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Anderson v. Bowers Towing et al.
as 5:2024cv00463
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey L. Anderson
Defendant:
Bowers Towing and Akron Police Officer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Carter v. Elkhart County Indiana et al
as 1:2024cv00104
Plaintiff:
Michael D. Carter, Jr.
Defendant:
Elkhart County Indiana, Elkhart County Court, Stephen R. Bowers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Carter v. Elkhart County Indiana et al
as 3:2024cv00214
Plaintiff:
Michael D. Carter, Jr.
Defendant:
Elkhart County Indiana, Elkhart County Court, Stephen R. Bowers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hernandez Richter v. Romero, et al.
as 24-1290
Plaintiff:
FERNANDO HERNANDEZ RICHTER
Defendant:
CHRISTOPHER ROMERO, Corrections Officer and JULIE BOWERS, Corrections Officer
Bowers v. TransUnion, LLC
as 8:2024cv01134
Plaintiff:
Dennis Da'Quan Bowers
Defendant:
TransUnion, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2024cv01130
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Nealy #209732 v. Thornell et al
as 2:2024cv00449
Plaintiff:
Charles E Nealy, Jr.
Defendant:
Ryan Thornell, Julie Bowers, J Barreras and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nealy #209732 v. Thornell et al
as 2:2024cv00448
Plaintiff:
Charles E Nealy, Jr.
Defendant:
Ryan Thornell, Richard M Johnson, Julie Bowers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
