Cases 1 - 10 of 86
Tate Prows v. City of Oxford, OH, et al
as 23-3920
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TATE DAVID PROWS
Defendant / Appellee:
CITY OF OXFORD, OH, CHIEF JOHN A. JONES, MICHAEL SMITH and others
Bracken v. Santa Fe Police Department et al
as 1:2023cv00501
Plaintiff:
Corey L Bracken
Defendant:
Santa Fe Police Department, City of Santa Fe and Albertsons
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Charles Bracken v. Township of Manor, et al
as 23-1763
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CHARLES BRACKEN
Defendant / Appellee:
TOWNSHIP OF MANOR, MANOR TOWNSHIP POLICE DEPARTMENT and FORMER CHIEF ERIC S. PETROSKY, in his official capacity and as an individual, jointly and severally
Prows v. City of Oxford et al
as 1:2022cv00693
Plaintiff:
Tate Prows and Tate David Prows
Defendant:
City of Oxford, Chief John A. Jones, Michael Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jennifer Garnica v. County of Los Angeles et al
as 2:2022cv06900
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Garnica
Defendant:
County of Los Angeles, Diana Lara, Veronica Torrez and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv03540
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv00281
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv02532
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv00856
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Interested Party:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv00190
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
