Cases 1 - 10 of 41
CORBETT v. OLIVER et al
as 1:2023cv00424
Plaintiff:
JAMES ANTHONY CORBETT
Defendant:
ELIZABETH OLIVER, LARRY BROWN, JUDGE THOMAS LAMBERTH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ALLEN v. CURETON et al
as 2:2023cv00798
Plaintiff:
BRAD ALLEN
Defendant:
ANTHONY CURETON, JOHN DOE and JANE DOE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Lykins v. Centrus Energy Corp. et al
as 1:2022cv00328
Plaintiff:
Brad Allen Lykins
Defendant:
Centrus Energy Corp., United States Enrichment Corporation, Uranium Disposition Services, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Lykins v. Centrus Energy Corp. et al
as 2:2022cv02440
Plaintiff:
Brad Allen Lykins
Defendant:
Centrus Energy Corp., United States Enrichment Corporation, Uranium Disposition Services, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Baker v. Goyel
as 3:2022cv00852
Plaintiff:
Brad Allen Baker
Defendant:
Vitek Coyer and Vitek Goyel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Baker v. Ni et al
as 3:2022cv00211
Plaintiff:
Brad Allen Baker
Defendant:
Hao Ni and Neal Massand
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Baker v. Gray
as 3:2022cv00031
Plaintiff:
Brad Allen Baker
Defendant:
Lori Baker Gray
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
THURMAN v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv53860
Plaintiff:
BRAD ALLEN THURMAN
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Dunn v. Lumpkin
as 21-40505
Respondent / Appellee:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Petitioner / Appellant:
Brad Allen Dunn
May et al v. Hundal et al
as 6:2021cv00272
Defendant:
Bulbulpreet Hundal and Hunter Express LTD
Plaintiff:
Samantha Horvatich, Brad Allen May, Melvia Louise May and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
