Cases 1 - 10 of 11
BERRY v. MASON et al
as 2:2023cv01392
Plaintiff:
GILBERT BERRY
Defendant:
RONALD MASON, BRADLEY MASON and CHARLES WRIGHT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
Lorick et al v. A'Viands LLC
as 2:2017cv02585
Plaintiff:
Brian Lorick , Carlus Anderson , Heirbrane Foster and others
Defendant:
A'Viands LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
M. Raja v. Segan, Mason & Mason, PC
as 13-1811
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MOHAMMAD NAWAZ RAJA and NEELUM NAWAZ RAJA
Defendant - Appellee:
SEGAN, MASON & MASON, PC, AIMEE THERESE HAY KESSLER, ANDREW P. HILL and others
Raja et al v. Segan, Mason & Mason, PC et al
as 1:2013cv00418
Plaintiff:
M Nawaz Raja and Neelum Nawaz Raja
Defendant:
Segan, Mason & Mason, PC , Aimee T.H. Kessler , Andrew P. Hill and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
HEARST et al v. MASON et al
as 1:2011cv00304
Plaintiff:
ADRIANNE N. HEARST , CHIMAIRA E. FARGO , ROBERT W. HEARST, VI and others
Defendant:
BRADLEY MASON , JOHN DOE NO. 1, JOHN DOE NO. 2 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DONER v. MASON et al
as 1:2010cv00058
Plaintiff:
PERCY CHARLES DONER
Defendant:
BRADLEY MASON, DAVID STAHLMAN and RICK AUSTIN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
WATSON et al v. MASON
as 1:2010cv00024
Plaintiff:
LESTER WATSON and MILDRED WATSON
Defendant:
BRADLEY MASON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
COBB v. MASON
as 1:2009cv00210
Petitioner:
KIP COBB
Respondent:
BRADLEY MASON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
STEVENS v. MASON et al
as 1:2009cv00208
Petitioner:
DANIEL ROBERT STEVENS, JR.
Respondent:
BRADLEY MASON, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF MCKEAN COUNTY and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
COBB v. MASON
as 2:2009cv03005
Petitioner:
KIP COBB
Respondent:
BRADLEY MASON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
