Cases 1 - 10 of 215
(HC) Iseli v. Lynch
as 2:2024cv01220
Petitioner:
Branden Willie Iseli
Respondent:
Jeff Lynch
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(PC) Iseli v. Johnson
as 2:2024cv01210
Plaintiff:
Branden Willie Iseli
Defendant:
William D. Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sims v. Greene County Detention Center
as 3:2024cv00070
Plaintiff:
Branden D Sims
Defendant:
Greene County Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ricks v. Weiser, et al
as 24-1141
Plaintiff:
JOHN ALLEN RICKS, SHANEL MOSSMAN, TIFFANY BALLAIN and others
Defendant:
PHILIP WEISER, JARED POLIS and ALL COUNTY JAILS AND COURTS OF COLORADO STATEWIDE
(HC) Iseli v. CDCR
as 2:2024cv01041
Petitioner:
Branden Willie Iseli
Respondent:
Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation of the State of California
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(HC) Iseli v. Lynch
as 2:2024cv00980
Petitioner:
Branden Willie Iseli
Respondent:
Jeff Lynch
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Huertas v. Semple et al
as 3:2024cv00537
Plaintiff:
Branden Huertas and Semple
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Taylor v. Myers et al
as 3:2024cv00273
Plaintiff:
John W Taylor, IV
Defendant:
Branden Myers, Matthew Graves, Ethan Wood and others
Not Yet Classified:
MIAMI E-FILE(Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DURHAM v. STALLER et al
as 3:2024cv04033
Plaintiff:
TREMAYNE DURHAM
Defendant:
BRANDEN STALLER, MD AMY EMRICH, ANTHONY GANGI and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Iseli v. State of California et al
as 3:2024cv00523
Plaintiff:
Branden Willie Iseli
Defendant:
State of California, County of San Joaquin, United States District Court and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
