Cases 11 - 20 of 52
Ackermann et al v. Ford Motor Company
as DE/1:22-CV-00767
Plaintiff:
Ackermann, Kati Ackermann, Nicole Adkins and others
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Ackermann et al v. Ford Motor Company
as 1:2022cv00767
Plaintiff:
Kati Ackermann, Nicole Adkins, Angela Agosto and others
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Whitehill et al v. Atlantic Building Systems, LLC
as 1:2022cv01118
Plaintiff:
Christopher Whitehill, Kim Herb, Eric Herb and others
Defendant:
Atlantic Building Systems, LLC doing business as Armstrong Steel Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Anderson et al v. MVM, Inc.
as 4:2022cv00015
Plaintiff:
Brandon Anderson, DaTarik Box, Isabel Correa and others
Defendant:
MVM, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Anderson v. White
as 4:2022cv00189
Plaintiff:
Brandon Anderson
Defendant:
Stacy White
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Anderson v. White
as 5:2022cv05034
Plaintiff:
Brandon Anderson
Defendant:
Nurse Stacy White
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
United States of America v. Parrish (Lewis)
as 21-2067
Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant:
Laquan Parrish, AKA MadDog, AKA Quanzas, Andre Bent, AKA Dula, Aaron Rodriguez, AKA Gunz, AKA Cito and others
Defendant / Appellant:
Jabriel Lewis, AKA Breeze, AKA Breezy
Murphy v. Payne et al
as 3:2021cv00141
Plaintiff:
Lisa Murphy
Defendant:
Payne, Faust, Inman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GwanJun Kim v. City of Ionia, MI, et al
as 21-1036
Plaintiff / Appellant:
GWANJUN KIM
Defendant / Appellee:
DAVID K. OTIS, CITY OF IONIA, MI, THOMAS TROY and others
Kim v. Ionia, City of et al
as 1:2020cv00843
Plaintiff:
RESTRICTED FILER GwanJun Kim
Defendant:
Jennifer Skorka, Ionia, City of, Thomas Troy and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
