Cases 1 - 10 of 49
Charles Martin v. Jeffrey Nines
as 24-6093
Petitioner:
CHARLES BRANDON MARTIN
Respondent:
JEFFREY NINES, Acting Warden and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND
Charles Martin v. Jeffrey Nines
as 24-6086
Petitioner:
CHARLES BRANDON MARTIN
Respondent:
JEFFREY NINES, Acting Warden and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND
TILLETT v. CITY OF INDIANAPOLIS et al
as 1:2023cv01984
Plaintiff:
NICHOLAS TILLETT
Defendant:
CITY OF INDIANAPOLIS, BRANDON MARTIN, GRACIELA ARIZMENDI and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bowman v. A & R Towing et al
as 8:2023cv02253
Plaintiff:
Opal Hal Bowman
Defendant:
A & R Towing and Brandon Martin Edward Rentz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal-Personal Injury
Kruse v. City of Elk River, The et al
as 0:2023cv02207
Plaintiff:
Kelsey Ann Kruse
Defendant:
City of Elk River, The, Elk River Police Department, David Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
GOGGANS v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv00799
Plaintiff:
BRANDON MARTIN GOGGANS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Bushnell et al v. Madison County Jail IL et al
as 3:2022cv02672
Plaintiff:
Joseph K Bushnell, Jevon Wilburn, Jason Spink and others
Defendant:
Madison County Jail IL, Sgt. Caldwell and Stephen Ridings
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Currie v. City of Elk River et al
as 0:2022cv00839
Plaintiff:
Brandon Currie
Defendant:
City of Elk River, Clayton Aswegan, Brandon Martin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv00247
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
MARTIN v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2021cv02889
Plaintiff:
BRANDON MARTIN
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
