Cases 41 - 50 of 72
Hoskins et al v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2019cv02145
Plaintiff:
Daniel Sonnier, Aaron Mosdal, Christopher Lawrence and others
Defendant:
3M Company, Aearo Technologies LLC and Aearo Technologies, LLC
Lanctot et al v. General Motors LLC et al
as 1:2019cv11339
Plaintiff:
Erik Young, Paul Martinelli, Robert Mcgill and others
Defendant:
General Motors LLC, Robert Bosch GmbH and Robert Bosch LLC
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
MILLER v 3M COMPANYet al
as 3:2019cv01114
Defendant:
AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and 3M COMPANY
Plaintiff:
BRANDON MILLER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
AGUILAR v 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2019cv00891
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL BROOKS, FRANK JAMES, KENNETH DAVIS and others
Defendant:
3M COMPANY and AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BENNETT et al v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2019cv00598
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER RUST, TODD EVANS, TAMALL SPURLOCK and others
Defendant:
AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and 3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Bennett et al v. 3M Company et al
as 1:2019cv00590
Plaintiff:
Christopher Rust, Todd Evans, Tamall Spurlock and others
Defendant:
Aearo Technologies, LLC and 3M Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Miller v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2019cv00624
Defendant:
Aearo Technologies, LLC and 3M Company
Plaintiff:
Brandon Miller
Aguilar et al v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2019cv00468
Plaintiff:
Michael Brooks, Frank James, Kenneth Davis and others
Defendant:
3M Company, Aearo Technologies LLC and Aearo Technologies, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BERRY v. MILLER et al
as 1:2019cv00188
Defendant:
WONKA, BRANDON MILLER and MARY ANN
Plaintiff:
EARLIE B.A. BERRY, JR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Miller v. Charter Nex Films - Delaware, OH, Inc. et al
as 2:2018cv01341
Defendant:
Charter Nex Holdings Company, Charter Nex Films - Delaware, OH, Inc. and Charter Nex Films, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Brandon Miller and Seth Recore
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
