Cases
Smith v. C R Bard Incorporated et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2020cv10790
Plaintiff: Brenda L Smith
Defendant: C R Bard Incorporated and Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Smith v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 2:2019cv04016
Plaintiff: Brenda L Smith
Defendant: C R Bard Incorporated and Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Smith v. Deutsche Bank National Trust Company et al
as 1:2017cv01844
Petitioner: Brenda L. Smith
Respondent: Deutsche Bank National Trust Company and Ocwen Loan Servicing, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Smith v. Colvin
as 4:2014cv00198
Plaintiff: Brenda L. Smith
Defendant: Carolyn W. Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416
Smith et al v. Cook Group, Inc. et al
as 2:2013cv14251
Plaintiff: Brenda L. Smith and Michael Smith
Defendant: Cook Biotech, Inc. , Cook Medical, Inc. , Cook Group, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
In re: Cook Medical, Inc., Pelvic Repair System Products Liability Litigation
as 2:2013md02440
Defendant: Covidien LP formerly known as Tyco Healthcare Group LP doing business as Covidien Inc. and Covidien Ltd.
In Re: Cook Medical, Inc., Pelvic Repair System Products Liability Litigation
Interested Party: Lana C. Keeton
Plaintiff: Elois Coruthers (WVSD CA 2:12-0418), Lawana Hart (WVSD CA 2:12-2983), Clarlinda Landers (WVSD CA 2:12-3618) and others
Consolidated Plaintiff: Shelia Mansfield (WVSD CA 2:13-14710), Sarah Ruth Dunnington (WVSD CA 2:13-14710) and Dennis Barfield (WVSD CA 2:13-14710)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Smith et al v. Cook, Inc. et al
as 5:2012cv00229
Plaintiff: Brenda L. Smith and Michael Smith
Defendant: Cook, Inc. , Cook Biotech, Inc. , Cook Medical, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?