Cases 11 - 20 of 37
Shaw v. Kaemingk et al
as 4:2017cv04116
Plaintiff:
James Elmer Shaw
Defendant:
Dennis Kaemingk, Robert Dooley, Darin Young and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 14-3662
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Dale Adams v. U.S. Dept of Labor/OSHA, et al
as 14-3466
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Dale Brent Adams
Defendant - Appellee:
United States Department of Labor, /OSHA and Hilda L. Solis, United States Secretory of Labor
ADAMS v. UNITED STATES DRUG ENFORCEMENT ADMINISTRATION et al
as 1:2014cv00846
Plaintiff:
DALE BRENT ADAMS
Defendant:
UNITED STATES DRUG ENFORCEMENT ADMINISTRATION, MICHELE M. LEONHART, UNITED STATES NATIONAL SECURITY AGENCY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Adams v. Houston Police Dept
as 4:2014cv01223
Plaintiff:
Nathan Brent Adams
Defendant:
Houston Police Dept
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Demetri Alexander v. USDC-NVL
as 14-71078
:
In re: DEMETRI ALEXANDER
Petitioner:
DEMETRI ALEXANDER
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEVADA, LAS VEGAS
Real Party In Interest:
BRIAN SANDOVAL, HAROLD ALBRIGHT, CATHERINE CORTEZ-MASTO and others
ADAMS v. MARTINEZ et al
as 1:2014cv00433
Plaintiff:
DALE BRENT ADAMS
Defendant:
NELDA MARTINEZ, CARLOS VALDEZ, FLOYD SIMPSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ADAMS v. MCCAIN et al
as 1:2014cv00289
Plaintiff:
DALE BRENT ADAMS
Defendant:
JOHN MCCAIN, MITCH MCCONNELL, HARRY REID and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Adams et al v. C. R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv06165
Plaintiff:
Marcia Lela Adams and Brent Adams
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc., Sofradim Production SAS and Tissue Science Laboratories Limited
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Dale Adams v. USDA, et al
as 12-3696
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Dale Brent Adams
Defendant - Appellee:
United States Department of Agriculture and Thomas J. Vilsack, United States Secretary of Agriculture
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
