Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Whitehead v. Presencelearning, Inc. et al
as 4:2023cv02247
Plaintiff:
Clay Whitehead
Defendant:
Presencelearning, Inc., Brian Rich and Catalyst Investors, L.P.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
State 48 Recycling Incorporated v. Janes et al
as 2:2022cv00767
Plaintiff:
State 48 Recycling Incorporated
Defendant:
Michael Ray Janes, Unknown Janes, Angel J Alva and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Caires v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, NA et al
as 3:2021cv00843
Defendant:
JPMorgan Chase Bank, NA, Brian Rich and Halloran & Sage LLP
Plaintiff:
Richard Caires
RICH v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv99455
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
BRIAN RICH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Caires v. Adams et al
as 3:2017cv01993
Plaintiff:
Richard Caires
Defendant:
Taggart D. Adams , Brian Rich , J.P. Morgan Chase Bank and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ramos-Rodriguez v. Beck et al
as 2:2017cv00498
Defendant:
Alyn Beck, Timothy Browder, Dr Duran and others
Plaintiff:
Manuel Ramos-Rodriguez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mulkey et al v. Rich et al
as 6:2015cv00294
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Mulkey
Defendant:
Brian Rich, Monty Grugan and McCurtain Memorial Medical Management, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Ramos-Rodriguez v. Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department et al
as 2:2015cv01212
Defendant:
Beck Alyn, Escartin Garret, K Holloway and others
Plaintiff:
Manuel Ramos-Rodriguez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
HAUSMAN et al v. RICH
as 3:2014cv02485
Plaintiff:
JAY HAUSMAN and ELIZABETH HAUSMAN
Defendant:
BRIAN RICH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Rich v. Hausman et al
as 3:2013cv01979
Plaintiff:
Brian Rich
Defendant:
Jay S. Hausman and Elizabeth M. Hausman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
