Cases 21 - 30 of 280
BROPHY v. BELFI
as 2:2023cv01551
Plaintiff:
MARY ELIZABETH BROPHY and MARY ELIZABETH BROPY
Defendant:
ALEXANDER BELFI
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Breach of Contract- Insurance
Mary Brophy, et al v. Alexander Belfi
as 23-1533
Plaintiff / Appellee:
MARY ELIZABETH BROPHY and MARY ELIZABETH BROPHY, As the Manager Partner of and Trading as League Street Partnership
Defendant / Appellant:
ALEXANDER BELFI and ALEXANDER BELFI, I
Brophy v. United States of America
as 7:2023cv00226
Plaintiff:
Ronnie Brophy
Defendant:
United States of America
Interested Party:
Torts Branch USDOJ
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2023cv06013
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-3016
Petitioner / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00918
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Bacher et al v. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. et al
as 3:2022cv01432
Plaintiff:
Beth Bacher, Joann Adams, Asha Atkins and others
Defendant:
Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Boehringer Ingelheim Corporation, Boehringer Ingelheim USA Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Howard et al v. City of San Francisco et al
as 4:2022cv05243
Plaintiff:
Lenika Howard, Rameia Appleton, Khaylum Richard-Howard and others
Defendant:
City of San Francisco, San Francisco Police Department, Eduard Ochoa and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Towne v. Gardner et al
as 1:2022cv00342
Plaintiff:
Brenda Towne
Defendant:
William Gardner, David Scanlan, Harri Hursti and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-1752
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
