Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Edwards v. Thompkins et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2026cv00721
Plaintiff:
Bryan Jermaine Edwards
Defendant:
Brian Thompkins, Corie Harris, Japlessa Thomas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HINES v. MONTGOMERY COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
as 2:2026cv07166
Plaintiff:
BRYAN HINES
Defendant:
MONTGOMERY COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bryan Health Retirement Committee v. Fritts
as 4:2026cv03283
Defendant:
Joshua Fritts and Louis A. Fritts-Yazdani
Plaintiff:
Bryan Health Retirement Committee
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2026cv03601
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Cole v. Vannoy et al
as 3:2026cv00995
Plaintiff:
Bryan Cole
Defendant:
Darrel Vannoy, Harry Connick, Sr., Christy Cole and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2026cv01279
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Underdog Exchange DCM, Inc.. et al v. Tong et al
as 3:2026cv01499
Plaintiff:
UNDERDOG EXCHANGE DCM, INC. and UDM, LLC d/b/a UNDERDOG PREDICT
Defendant:
WILLIAM TONG, BRYAN T. CAFFERELLI and KRISTOFER GILMAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment
Pitts v. Federal Express Corporation
as 1:2026cv04496
Plaintiff:
Bryan Lee Pitts
Defendant:
Federal Express Corporation
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2 (a) Fair Labor Standards Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2026cv01902
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Age)
Dunn v. French et al
as 2:2026cv02046
Plaintiff:
Damien Dunn
Defendant:
Brittney French, Kevin Kellum, Jordan Lambert and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
