Cases 1 - 10 of 1,619
Ford #181879 v. Morrison et al
as 1:2024cv00459
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Ford #181879
Defendant:
Bryan Morrison, Heidi Washington and Christine Bolden
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brooks v. Wilson et al
as 1:2024cv01098
Plaintiff:
David Bryan Brooks
Defendant:
Brad Wilson, Donna Hetherington, Jody Pickens and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Bryan v. Indivior Inc. et al.
as 1:2024sf65393
Plaintiff:
Cindy L Bryan
Defendant:
Indivior Inc., Indivior PLC, Indivior Solutions Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Ramon Caldwell v. Bryan Morrison
as 24-1376
Petitioner:
RAMON CALDWELL
Respondent:
BRYAN MORRISON, Warden
Nancy Hooks v. City of Warren, MI, et al
as 24-1375
Plaintiff:
NANCY HOOKS
Defendant:
CITY OF WARREN, MI, POLICE OFFICER LUCAS DOE, POLICE OFFICER BRYAN MUNAFO and others
Blanton v. USA
as 5:2024cv00112
Petitioner:
Bryan Lamar Blanton
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Jackson v. City of Canton et al.
as 5:2024cv00740
Plaintiff:
Destinee N. Jackson
Defendant:
City of Canton, Lieutenant Lester Marino, Sergeant Bryan McWilliams and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Rodrigues Talbert v. Bryan Morrison
as 24-1338
Petitioner:
RODRIGUES TALBERT
Respondent:
BRYAN MORRISON, Warden
Stepanoff et al v. Bite Ninja, Inc.
as 2:2024cv02252
Plaintiff:
Theodore Stepanoff, Bradley McKinney, Ryan P. Cooper and others
Defendant:
Bite Ninja, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1145 E.R.I.S.A.
Crawford et al v. McKinley et al
as 3:2024cv00246
Plaintiff:
Lawrence L. Crawford, Jonah Gabriel JahJah T. Tishbite, Alton Chisolm and others
Defendant:
Senior Judge Joseph H. McKinley, Jr., The United States Congress, The United States Senate and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 bv Bivens Non-Prisoner
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
