Cases 1 - 10 of 75
Cary v. Teske
as 5:2026cv11302
Plaintiff:
Bryan Allen Cary
Defendant:
Teske
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Allen v. Sheriff of Lake County
as 5:2026cv00225
Petitioner:
Anthony Bryan Allen
Respondent:
Sheriff of Lake County
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Allen et al v. Bowen et al
as 2:2026cv00211
Plaintiff:
Justin Andrew Allen, Ethan Dave Ray, Eian Kade Ray and others
Defendant:
Ralph T. Bowen and CMH Manufacturing, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Allen v. Bluth et al
as 2:2026cv00141
Petitioner:
Derrick Bryan Allen
Respondent:
Jacqueline Bluth and Eighth Judicial Court
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Cary v. Campbell et al
as 2:2026cv10076
Plaintiff:
Bryan Allen Cary
Defendant:
Campbell, Kortey, Esu and others
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Abel et al v. 3M Company et al
as 2:2025cv11262
Plaintiff:
Tyler Abel, Scott Aber, Jerome Abeyta and others
Defendant:
3M Company, AGC Chemical Americas, Inc., Arkema Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Allen v. Campbell et al
as 8:2025cv00652
Plaintiff:
David Bryan Allen
Defendant:
Judge Lisa D. Campbell, Judge Michelle Sisco, State Attorney Jennifer Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2025cv00557
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Greene v. Allen
as 4:2024cv00331
Plaintiff:
Samantha E. Greene
Defendant:
Officer Bryan Allen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
GRIFFEY v. ALLEN et al
as 2:2024cv00437
Plaintiff:
ROMAN GRIFFEY
Defendant:
POLICE OFFICER BRYAN ALLEN, POLICE OFFICER MATTHEW WILLIAMSON, SGT. MATTHEW KUMA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
