Cases 1 - 10 of 36
Miller v. NY Times Newspaper
as 5:2026cv12103
Petitioner:
Christopher Bryan Miller
Respondent:
NY Times Newspaper
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ephraim et al v. Soto et al
as 1:2026cv10713
Plaintiff:
Tierra Ephraim and Bryan Miller
Defendant:
Cesar Soto, Bryan Canales and City of Chicago
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026at01389
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv02839
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026at01388
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Kelly et al v. City of St. Louis et al
as 4:2026cv01301
Plaintiff:
Katrina Kelly, Dolares Nash and Bryan Miller
Defendant:
CITY OF ST. LOUIS, Jennifer Clemmons-Abdullah, Physician Correctional USA (MO), LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Griffith v. Towns et al
as 9:2026cv01504
Plaintiff:
Brandon Lee Griffith
Defendant:
Darryl C. Towns, Board of Parole, Aaron J. Torres and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Miller v. Wal-Mart Stores East, LP et al
as 1:2026cv00906
Plaintiff:
Bryan Miller
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores East, LP and Walmart, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Warren et al v. 3M Company, f/k/a Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company, et al
as 2:2025cv11750
Plaintiff:
Abraham Warren, Adam Casborn, Adrian Letrece Jenkins and others
Defendant:
AGC Chemicals Americas Inc., Amerex Corporation, Arkema, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
