Cases 1 - 10 of 11
IRS, et alIn re: IRS, et al
as 24-301
Petitioner:
In re: INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE, DANNY WERFEL, in his official capacity as Commissioner of Internal Revenue, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY and others
Respondent:
BUCKEYE INSTITUTE
State of Missouri v. Biden
as 23-30445
Plaintiff / Appellee:
State of Missouri, State of Louisiana, Aaron Kheriaty and others
Defendant / Appellant:
Joseph R. Biden, Jr., Vivek H. Murthy, Xavier Becerra and others
Amicus Curiae:
Children's Health Defense, Leland Stanford Junior University, Electronic Frontier Foundation and others
The Buckeye Institute v. Internal Revenue Service et al
as 2:2022cv04297
Plaintiff:
The Buckeye Institute
Defendant:
Internal Revenue Service, Commissioner Douglas O'Donnell, United States Department of Treasury and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment
State of Texas v. Yellen
as 22-10560
Plaintiff / Appellee:
State of Texas, State of Mississippi and State of Louisiana
Defendant / Appellant:
Janet Yellen, in her official capacity as Secretary of the Treasury, Richard K. Delmar, in his official capacity as Acting Inspector General of the Department of the Treasury, United States Department of the Treasury and others
Amicus Curiae:
National Taxpayers Union Foundation, Buckeye Institute, New Civil Liberties Alliance and others
Missouri et al v. Biden et al
as 3:2022cv01213
Plaintiff:
State of Missouri, State of Louisiana, Aaron Kheriaty and others
Defendant:
Joseph R Biden, Jr, Jennifer Rene Psaki, Vivek H. Murthy and others
Petitioner:
Judson Witham, Kimberly D Hogan, Mike Webb and others
Consolidated Defendant:
Samaruddin K Stewart, Henry Schwartz and Global Engagement Center
Amicus Curiae:
Alliance Defending Freedom, Buckeye Institute and Childrens Health Defense
Consolidated Plaintiff:
Connie Sampognaro
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Boe et al v. Marshall et al
as 2:2022cv00184
Plaintiff:
Paul A. Eknes-Tucker, Brianna Boe, James Zoe and others
Defendant:
Kay Ivey, Steve Marshall, Daryl D. Bailey and others
Intervenor Plaintiff:
United States of America
Amicus Curiae:
State of Arkansas, State of West Virginia, State of Indiana and others
Petitioner:
Eagle Forum of Alabama and Southeast Law Institute
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Arizona, State of v. Yellen et al
as 2:2021cv00514
Defendant:
Janet Yellen, United States Department of the Treasury and Richard K Delmar
Plaintiff:
Arizona, State of
Amicus Curiae:
Buckeye Institute, National Taxpayers Union Foundation and Chamber of Commerce of the United States
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
NATIONAL ASSOCIATION FOR THE ADVANCEMENT OF COLORED PEOPLE et al v. DEVOS et al
as 1:2020cv01996
Plaintiff:
KEISHA GUYTON, LISA MINGRONE, PASADENA UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT and others
Defendant:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION and ELISABETH D. DEVOS
Amicus Curiae:
TEXAS CENTER FOR EDUCATIONPOLICY AT THE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS - AUSTIN, CENTER FOR LAW AND EDUCATION, ROUGHRIDER POLICY CENTER and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
State of Michigan et al v. DeVos et al
as 3:2020cv04478
Plaintiff:
District of Columbia, State of Maine, State of New Mexico and others
Defendant:
Betsy DeVos and United States Department of Education
Amicus Curiae:
Association of Christian Schools International, James Madison Institute, Wisconsin Council of Religious & Independent Schools and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Competitive Enterprise Institu, et al v. EPA, et al
as 15-1488
Petitioner:
Competitive Enterprise Institute, Buckeye Institute for Public Policy Solutions, Independence Institute and others
Respondent:
Environmental Protection Agency and Regina A. McCarthy, Administrator, United States Environmental Protection Agency
Amicus Curiae For Petitioner:
Municipal Electric Authority of Georgia
Movant-Amicus Curiae For Respondent:
American Thoracic Society, American Medical Association, American College of Preventive Medicine and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
