Cases 1 - 10 of 100
United States of America v. Buckley et al
as 3:2026cv00274
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Adarryl Buckley and Adarryl Buckley doing business as AMB Transport, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729 False Claims Act
Buckley v. Barrett Financial Group LLC
as 2:2026cv06579
Plaintiff:
Sandee Buckley
Defendant:
Barrett Financial Group LLC
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Brietzke v. Buckley
as 1:2026cv14001
Plaintiff:
Sandra Brietzke
Defendant:
John R Buckley
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2026cv03388
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e-2 Job Discrimination
Booker v. Larry et al
as 1:2026cv10229
Plaintiff:
Charlie Booker
Defendant:
Catherine Larry, John Benson, John Bergholtz and others
:
Service List
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Buckley v. Stoudt
as 2:2026cv01429
Petitioner:
Khalil Buckley
Respondent:
Paula Stoudt
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Buckley v. GMRI, Inc. et al
as 3:2026cv00391
Plaintiff:
Carolyn Buckley
Defendant:
GMRI, Inc., Darden Restaurants, Inc. and Knocks8, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Non-Motor Vehicle
Odoms v. Buckley Fence, LLC et al
as 1:2026cv03658
Plaintiff:
Jason D. Odoms
Defendant:
Buckley Fence, LLC, Buckley & Associates, LLC a Colorado limited liability company doing business as KAB Agency, James (I) A. Buckley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
v. Odoms et al
as 1:2026cv03657
Defendant:
Jason Odoms, Buckley Fence, LLC, Buckley & Associates, LLC d/b/a KAB Agency and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Zachry v. Harkrider et al
as 2:2026cv03017
Plaintiff:
Dr. Anne H. Zachry
Defendant:
Dr. Ashley Harkrider and Dr. Peter Buckley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
